Wanna bet a few old ladies who were ‘regulars’ were flapping their jaws at each Joann retail location?
Court documents are showing up and there’s an exaggerated sense of what’s “appropriate” versus “inapproprate” ... whatever in particular may or may not have been mentioned in court.

On the presumption that there are men who do arts and crafts and are not gay, these are not the right stores for them obviously.
Just like libraries, parks and school districts. Essential for unmarried men who are not cops to avoid at all costs.
In a red-light district of vice, carnality and organized retail theft, stores like this have somehow lost the income of honest citizens’ discretionary spending.
Of the types of men who might be present on the property, including busybodies in other men’s matters, we have certified and ordained “men of the cloth” by whose preaching all other men must be either “philanderers” or “womanizers” by definition; and consequently innocent men who intend to preserve their self-respect, reputations and livelihoods are left with no choice but to resort to vice to punish those solicitous preachers out of their presumptions of their guilt for choice of needle or thread or buttons or scraps of cloth or whatever, duly paid for, with receipt in hand. And what a sad situation that is, could have been entirely avoided by desisting from gossiping.