Pam Bondi’s hometown bar baggage and the false precept of the “Jewish shopkeeper’s privilege” in Florida
Dirty cops have been making too many books
The 2024 Florida Statutes (including 2025 Special Session C) Title XLVI CRIMES Chapter 812 THEFT, ROBBERY, AND RELATED CRIMES View Entire Chapter 812 § 015 ¶ (3)(a) A law enforcement officer, a merchant, a farmer, or a transit agency’s employee or agent, who has probable cause to believe that a retail theft, farm theft, a transit fare evasion, or trespass, or unlawful use or attempted use of any antishoplifting or inventory control device countermeasure, has been committed by a person and, in the case of retail or farm theft, that the property can be recovered by taking the offender into custody may, for the purpose of attempting to effect such recovery or for prosecution, take the offender into custody and detain the offender in a reasonable manner for a reasonable length of time. In the case of a farmer, taking into custody shall be effectuated only on property owned or leased by the farmer. In the event the merchant, merchant’s employee, farmer, or a transit agency’s employee or agent takes the person into custody, a law enforcement officer shall be called to the scene immediately after the person has been taken into custody.
We’re calling the so-called “shopkeeper’s privilege” obscenely Jewish here, not out of any sense of our own of antisemitism or inappropriate stereotypes, or to disparage ethnic Jews or any shopkeepers who do not abuse the legal system, but simply to state the fact that this is the Bible Belt without the Good News in America. The Law without the Gospel for Christians, or the Law without the Prophets for Jews. We assume that most of these people’s kids attend Judæo-Christian Sunday School and learn the Ten Commandments essentially straight out of the Torah as translated into English, and there is not really a whole lot of mercy or grace or salvation in a justice system, which while claiming to protect Jews, actually serves to perpetuate the worst of the worst of stereotypes of Jews and places them under the harshest possible laws of their former Egyptian taskmasters.
Where does Laura Loomer come from? And how does she fit in with this whole sordid pseudo-legal mess?
The end result of such obnoxiously false and presumptuous antebellum acts of pretended legislation south of the Mason-Dixon line is not law and order. Only two outcomes are possible. First, there are dead shopkeepers, dead farmers and dead busdrivers and these are cases of justifiable homicide by any reasonable and prudent interpretation of the law. Second, there are living shopkeepers, farmers and busdrivers who face serious criminal charges of aggravated assault, battery, false imprisonment and human trafficking for exercising a falsely presumed shopkeeper’s privilege against law-abiding customers, again, by any reasonable and prudent interpretation of the law.
The Edelstein Firm
Do these presumptuaous aggrandizing street vendors really need to be given thirty days’ notice to close up their tourist trap shops forever and cease and desist picking customers’ pockets and bilking and defrauding U.S. citizens with false criminal charges? Which if any of the chintzy items or imported souvenirs, pieces of junk, skimpy clothing, bric-a-brac and paddy-whack for sale on every sidewalk or brick-and-mortar establishment in Florida is worth the human life of a sorry vendor, let alone that of an innocent law-abiding customer or would-be customer in a court of law over some fictitious matter or another as brought by a falsely privileged shopkeeper?
Do people really have to be so criminally stupid and ignorant as to take up and entertain in court any and all manner of pseudo-legal statutory legislative filth that happens to be written up as supposed “law” in spite of the due process of law and in spite of the Constitution which is the source of all due authority of the law?
The final ruling in the case of Marbury v. Madison must stand against the Florida shopkeeper’s privilege and all similarly repugnant acts of pretended legislation, namely, “that a law repugnant to the Constitution is void, and that courts, as well as other departments, are bound by that instrument.” If this Supreme Court ruling in favor of the Constitution is not allowed to stand, or if modern-day state and local courts do not recognize it, then there is neither any law or order in Florida nor any pretense of such to be had or maintained. Matters of war, or civil war, as the case may be, are not with the juristiction of the courts of the State of Florida. It is not a good thing in Pam Bondi’s history to have been involved in prosecuting U.S. citizens in mass trials under such pretended antebellum legislative acts of overly presumptuous shopkeepers’ privilege.