Is it the cancer or the name of the cancer or what the name of the cancer is called?
Simulated Service Of Process (S.O.P.) with official-sounding diagnoses for female cancers and assumed trust in politics of "choice" and free access to abortion services etc.
You can't read "Men's Rights Activists" posting online or have little boys with a Jewish-sounding last name and seriously conclude there's decent healthcare available for women any more than there is for men, with "bro doctors" practicing as hospital administrators, gynecologists and obstetricians etc.
Years ago, I had a few polyps and tumors that spread to different parts of my body with very high white blood cells counts at times, but I was never "served" with any official diagnosis of cancer. I do not believe this is that far out of the ordinary of what constitutes "the human condition." How many cells in the human body and none of them ever mutate?
What warrants the doctoring with radiation and chemotherapy and what is best left to run its course with only, say, nursing or supportive care and habits of healthy living, not to misuse the knife or sicken patients with rare isotopes and toxic drugs?
There is also a beauty industry that dwarfs the healthcare industry, and there are women with spiteful desires to cause other women's hair to fall out in the industry of business and politics.
Healthcare isn't delivered out of pure selfless altruism. The goals and objectives of those providing it need to be examined, along with the incentives and disincentives that drive or motivate their professional practices.


And meanwhile the men who smoke aren't getting cancer anymore? Who's keeping track of the baseball stats here?

