"You've been trespassed!"

There are many YouTube videos of police misconduct online but this is one of the worst examples of it.

I am only a "multada," not a lawyer, so I can't give legal advice. However I can state flat out without qualification that whatever these cops are enforcing with their back office court systems, warrants and bail bonds extortion systems, child support, alimony, pawn shop, payday loan and gambling debt collection systems, etc., it has nothing to do with the law on their side of the case.

Anyone who is a competent lawyer could have any one of these business trespass suits immediately dismissed for any number of reasons, and if it ever did go to trial, there is nothing for a reasonable person called to jury duty to conclude beyond a reasonable doubt that a crime of "trespass" has occurred at a place of business open for business to the public, barring any actual lawful orders for a particular person to stay away from a particular place for a particular time. The violation of such an order, if it were an actual order, would not be the crime of "trespass" anyways; it would have to be charged under some other statute, if it is a crime at all.

Otherwise, barring any cogent legal interpretations of the intentions of overly religious police officers, judges and business owners, their vicious practices of "trespassing" targeted individuals at various public places can only be interpreted as a public bann or generic rebuke of those individuals as "sinners" or "trespassers" in a back-office courthouse religious sense, together with strong demands for bail bond monies and/or fines from "multadas" or trespassed individuals as an overly aggressive passing of the hat for tithes, in jurisdictions where the separation of church and state has failed or succumbed to the naked hostility of local cops, judges and business owners against targeted individuals.

Questions to ask the officer and the judge

  • Why am I being charged with "criminal trespass" at a place of business when it is in fact open for business to the public and I am not doing anything else criminal or anything any other customer or member of the general public would not do?
  • When did this alleged "trespass order" become effective?
  • When does this alleged "trespass order" expire?
  • When was I lawfully informed of this alleged trespass order?
  • When was it ordered by the court?
  • What is your name and badge number?
  • Are you willing to provide a sworn statement to me on penalty of perjury as to the true and complete facts and circumstances of this alleged trespass order?
  • If police officers, judges and business owners are simulating legal process (against the law) with various falsified or falsely sworn business and public place trespass suits, then why are they not being prosecuted and punished for the crime of simulating legal process, as such crime is defined in many jurisdictions?
ORS 162.355 – Simulating legal process
A person commits the crime of simulating legal process if, with the intent to harass, injure or defraud another person, the person…
... with the intent to harass, injure or defraud another person, the person knowingly issues or delivers to another person any document that in form and substance falsely simulates civil or criminal process. ... Simulating legal process is a Class C felony.
2024 Alaska Statutes :: Title 11. Criminal Law :: Chapter 56. Offenses Against Public Administration :: Article 4. Offenses Relating to Judicial and Other Proceedings. :: Sec. 11.56.620. Simulating legal process
Alaska Stat. § 11.56.620 - Simulating legal process from 2024 Alaska Statutes
... any purported summons, subpoena, or other legal process knowing that the process was not issued or authorized by a court or other official body authorized by law to do so. ... Simulating legal process is a class A misdemeanor.
RCW 9a.40.040: Unlawful imprisonment.
25 CFR 11.404 -- False imprisonment.

The term "multada" is used for a person who has been fined, trespassed, and/or arrested repeatedly on false or unsubstantiated petty charges, and typically trafficked on the street by sexually aggressive police officers who are often themselves drunk and high and derelict in their duties to explain (but not excuse) such misconduct. There is often a "quid pro quo" of petty revenge through police procedure and courthouse systems for a person's refusal to submit to the sexual advances of police officers acting as pimps or their approved clients acting as johns.

Sorority girl arrested again only weeks after mugshot went viral
A University of Georgia student and member of the Alpha Chi sorority who gained attention for her smiling mugshot earlier this month has been arrested again.

The term came to light in a recent federal indictment of a gang known as "Tren de Aragua" and certain rivals and associates, "Anti-Tren" etc.

27 Members or Associates of Tren de Aragua Charged with Racketeering, Narcotics, Sex Trafficking, Robbery and Firearms offenses