‘Red flag’ at the doctor’s office
Cops and doctors are grabbing guns again
LAURAN NEERGAARD
Her top tip: Bring a list of symptoms and questions to show at the start of the visit. The first item should be your top concern, but seeing the full list helps your doctor prioritize what’s most medically urgent. ¶“I’m actually going to be able to see, is there a red flag?” explained Nosal, who has some advice about prepping for a typical primary care visit.
“AMA Immediate Past President” Jack Resneck Jr., M.D. is or was a board-certified gun-grabber and circumcision expert, or gun control advocate and foreskin doctor in other words. What’s up with the human skin that isn’t immediately apparent to the unlearned without all the excessive doctoring?
American Medical Association
Supporting Medical Professionals in Utilizing Extreme Risk Protection Orders to Prevent Firearm Violence Among High-risk Patients … ¶“Physicians are encouraged to ask patients at risk of firearm injury about access to firearms during routine patient visits. Allowing physicians to petition the courts when they encounter a patient at risk of firearm violence is necessary and could help prevent further firearm-related tragedies,” said AMA Immediate Past President Jack Resneck Jr., M.D. ¶Today’s policy builds on AMA policy adopted in 2022 which called for AMA to develop a toolkit to improve physician use of ERPOs.
Meanwhile the nurses who never read the Bible are hard at work cutting Samson’s hair, putting out his eyes and ensuring there is a good cause in a court of law to keep him safe in prison where he won’t be at risk of hurting another woman’s feelings.
American Academy of Nursing Statement on Firearm Safety and Violence Prevention (November 17, 2022)
… restrictions for married spouses with a history of domestic abuse that prevents these offenders from purchasing guns.14 However, this restriction does not currently apply to partners, boyfriends/girlfriends, and other non-married individuals. This “boyfriend loophole” is significant, given that an average of 70 women are shot and killed each month and access to a gun in settings with domestic abuse makes it five times more likely that a woman will be killed.15,16 Extreme risk laws, or red flag laws, allow loved ones or law enforcement to petition a court for an order to temporarily prevent a person in crisis from harming themselves or others by removing access to guns and prohibiting the purchase of firearms.17,18 These risk laws vary state by state and should be implemented nationally to protect individuals who are married and/or dating someone who may inflict harm to them or others using a firearm. …
The nurses’ position is even worse than that of the doctors, essentially promoting a naked policy of denying medical care to male gun owners, shooing them out of the medical clinic and romance-scamming them out of their guns at the local police station. And since nurses are always required to be so appropriately feminine in appearance and demeanor and professional etiquette, I suppose they also consider it extremely unladylike of other women to own guns, say for self-defense, as though the thought never really occurred to them. Their preferred man-hating female strategy is apparently to consent quite willingly if not eagerly to date rape and marital rape, and then call police upon discovering that their boyfriend or husband is a gun owner. That’s not real life, however, and nothing is left of it for “Men’s Rights Activist” strawmen to be agitated about. The “feminist collective” is a Marxist lie which is always exposed due to women’s natural propensity toward mutual backstabbing and falling in love with men.
Steve Benen
“Take the firearms first and then go to court,” Trump interjected. At the same event, the president endorsed a law enforcement model in which police officers confiscated some Americans’ guns “whether they had the right or not.” ¶When Republicans derailed those negotiations and nothing passed, there was another mass shooting a year later, at which point Trump again wanted a gun bill, including restrictions on assault rifles — which, according to multiple accounts, was one of his long-sought goals. ¶In other words, as recently as his first term, the president at least briefly sought ambitious gun reforms, up to and including extrajudicial gun confiscations.
The hostile actions they are taking are not in line with the language they are talking in court.
Larry Keane
The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) is reported to be opening a new dedicated Second Amendment Rights Section inside the Civil Rights Division. This marks a historic course correction in federal policy and highlights the Trump Administration’s continued effort to assess ongoing infringements on Second Amendment rights. According to reporting, the new office will open this week and focus on investigating state and local laws or policies that improperly limit the right to keep and bear arms. ¶President Donald Trump signed his Presidential Executive Order Protecting Second Amendment Rights back on February 7, 2025, instructing U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi to review all presidential and agency actions taken between January 2021 and January 2025 that “purport to promote safety” but infringed on the rights of law-abiding citizens. That includes rules issued by the DOJ and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF), classifications of firearms and ammunition, regulatory enforcement policies and even reports issued by the former taxpayer-funded White House Office of Gun Violence Prevention that just pushed gun control.
The link on the Civil Rights Division Second Amendment Section is to a generic Civil Rights complaint form or process. Such complaints are typically about discrimination against women or minorities or certain socially marginalized “groups” of people and are not typically relevant to “individuals” as such who are petitioning the government for a redress of grievances.