More neo-Nazi gun control
Owning a gun is a prototypical "male" thing even if many women do own guns.
If you're a "gay" man, then obviously you are not allowed to own a gun, since homosexuality is considered a mental illness. Except it is never the homosexuals themselves who are considered mentally ill. It is always the innocent ones they desire so unnaturally whom they deem to be mentally ill and unfit to possess a firearm in a court of law.
So let's just say you are an attractive male, presumably desired by other males who are gay. Do those other males really desire you or your company for your physical attractiveness? Obviously they do not. It is unnatural. It is a vicious competition among males for female company, and to keep other men away from "their" women.
Tom Knighton
So if a man is "straight" and he owns a gun, then he is subject to the usual service of process in court for collections of DNA samples on a presumption of alimony & child support owed, any domestic violence restraining orders on file that would prevent him from owning a gun, and criminal trespasses served by women or on behalf of women for the general safety of women in the community, even if none of those women in particular is actually pressing any particular criminal charges against him.
Haberdashers with such a strong sense of appropriateness who keep guns behind the counter aren't really selling them to us as to law-abiding men and women, of course. They're just letting us look at their guns, taking our fingerprints and working up arrest warrants against us on behalf of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Handcuffs.
The usual foreign-influenced communist-party police academy philosophy applies. The going police academy assumption is that we know we're not supposed to own guns anymore as law-abiding citizens in America, and that we should look, feel and act as criminals for owning guns if we do own them, and even quite lawfully at that.