Jeans need not be controversial
Except for gun-controlled white-collar consumers of armed blue-collar labor
Jeans are traditional Western outdoor garments along with cowboy boots, leather belts, flannel shirts, rifles, pistols and shotguns. Not every day is a wedding day, and there are plenty of people who wear jeans to weddings and other formal occasions anyways.
A different brand is needed after dumping Levi's because of their extreme gun control policies.
"Sydney Sweeney has great jeans"
Almost instantly, it received pushback from some on social media. //They criticised the advert's genes pun - including one line which said the blonde-haired, blue-eyed actress "has great jeans" - as echoing rhetoric associated with eugenics, the discredited belief that humanity could be improved through selective breeding.
It's that quite an absurd stretch, from jeans to genes to eugenics? Pun or not, she's selling the jeans to zip up and cover your selective breeding parts.
It's a Democrat Party consumer client dress-up routine. These blue-collar "workers" don't want their white-collar customers wearing jeans at all. They want their patrons all dressed up wearing slacks and dresses so they can charge them more money, tips, taxes and fees for everything.
"Nice" clothes for formal black tie occasions do not typically include riveted blue jeans, but other occasions of work that would otherwise ruin such finery or expensive clothes definitely do call for jeans. People have to step in mud puddles and they don't want to be fleeced.