Europe as a pœnal colony for dishonorable professionals exiled from America with their ill-gotten gains

And particularly for spychiatrists and spychologists who don't mind their own business at the State Department level.

Europe will gladly accept the ill-gotten gains of dishonest professionals and white-collar criminals from America who wish to "retire" there, but they take more precautions against being bilked and scammed and robbed and ripped off financially themselves than Americans are allowed to in their own country.

Retiring abroad may lead to more social loneliness, study suggests

Older people who retired abroad were more likely to find their social circles lackluster compared with those who stayed home, but their closest relationships were just as fulfilling.

Euronews

Psychological Care for Expats - Truman Group

Truman Group provides high quality, English-speaking psychological care for expats living outside the US. Our experienced professionals treat a wide range of mental health needs.

Truman Group

A Deeper Dive Into Moving Abroad

How will you support yourself in a move abroad? Options abound for paying your bills, obtaining psychotherapy, and other logistical considerations of a move abroad.

Psychology TodayTamara L Goldsby Ph.D.

Do psychologists travel to other countries for their job, specifically for therapy purposes?

Answer: Most psychologists do not do therapy; psychology is first and foremost a research degree. Clinical/counseling psychologists, who are more likely to do therapy, typically don’t do a lot of traveling. It’s rare for them to practice outside their home country because the qualifications vary…

Quora

As far as all white (and/or Hispanic) Americans are concerned, presumably our ancestors at some point made the decision to "retire" from their medieval European employment and move "abroad" to the Americas to build a new life.

Europe remains locked, castle-and-dungeon style, in corrupt popery, officious royalty, Marxist filth and medieval struggles to this day. Some countries such as France, Germany, Finland, Poland, and for that matter Russia have had revolutions and disavowed their allegiance to hereditary royalty. Other countries such as Spain, Britain, Norway and Sweden have not.

In those countries the royals retain a secretive hidden iron grip on power, as David Icke would say, shape-shifting reptilians. In some sense the rejection of royalty is a form of communism (democracy, rule by voting, rule by common people as opposed to royalty) we must accept if we don't want kings and queens and pop culture VIPs ruling over us with absolute authority, but the Marxist dictatorship class that then arises (e.g. the Kim dynasty of North Korea) is essentially the same thing as the hereditary royalty of old, because merely deposing heads of state does little or nothing to change the manners or customs or traditions of government or address the root causes of people's dissatisfaction.

There's always going to be government, even though government is inherently evil because of fallen human nature. Those legislative powers are incapable of annihilation, and a violent Mob of organized criminals will immediately rise to power if the law-abiding are ever lax or allow their grip on guns or their rule and authority over their own land to lapse.