Corrupt cops & pro-police bar associations
Together with an irredeemably corrupt state-cum-federal court system, complicit in an absolute and total denial of gun rights
Suzanne Downing
The article lists the following directives as presumably issued to the Alaska Bar Association for regulating the behavior of lawyers in Alaska. The concern of the Trump administration obviously is the behavior of Democrat lawyers targeting Republicans, but the directives themselves must be politically neutral to save face and have any relevancy to an impartial legal system, and it looks like many of these directives will backfire against Republicans and law-abiding gun owners.
- Seek sanctions against attorneys and law firms engaging in frivolous, unreasonable, and vexatious litigation against the United States.
- Prioritize enforcement of regulations governing attorney conduct and discipline.
- Refer attorneys for disciplinary action when their conduct appears to violate professional conduct rules, particularly in cases impacting national security, homeland security, public safety, or election integrity.
- Review attorney conduct over the past eight years in litigation against the federal government and recommend further actions if misconduct is identified.
A number of hidden disputes appear to be kept behind the counter, relatively hidden and undisclosed to the general public.
- Pamela Cravez, “A Revolt in the Ranks: The Great Alaska Court-Bar Fight,” Alaska Law Review, vol. 13, no. 1, 1996 https://alaskabar.org/wp-content/uploads/A-Revolt-in-the-Ranks_-The-Great-Alaska-Court-Bar-Fight-open-access-1.pdf
Aggressive and indiscriminate gun-grabbing by federal agents in Alaska appears to be protected under these directives, and petitions for the restoration of gun rights to law-abiding citizens are more likely to be denied and thrown out under these directives. Such petitions, namely, “litigation against the United States” and/or “litigation against the federal government” of course pertain directly to our right to petition the government for a redress of grievances in pursuance of the First Amendment.
Conservative or civil rights litigation of cases impacting national security, homeland security, public safety, or election integrity seems to be prohibited and discouraged under the same directives. There is a strong bias in favor of heavy-handed federal beat-copping in the Alaska court system, federal as well as state.
Vicinage, double jeopardy & the dual state+federal bar
Vicinage or ambiguous jurisdiction is prohibited by the Sixth Amendment clause requiring a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law.
The term vicinage refers precisely to this failure of a district of proper jurisdiction to have been previously ascertained by law.
However, in spite of any prohibitions on vicinage or requirements of districts of proper jurisdiction to have been previously ascertained by law, gun rights are up for grabs between state and federal authorities in all states and districts throughout the United States, depending solely on whether state or federal cops come first with their guilty-as-charged felony charges against law-abiding gun owners who are denied all defense under bar rules.
Double jeopardy is prohibited by the Fifth Amendment clause that “[n]o person shall ... be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb.”
This is a direct acknowledgment of the life-ruining and crippling effects of gun control and other measures imposed against targeted individuals or political dissidents who are constantly harassed by both federal and state police officers, and aggressively prosecuted for all imaginable offenses with or without probable cause in all court systems claiming any possibility of jurisdiction, including by military officers on nearby military bases or installations of the federal government.
The Alaska District of the federal court system cites an agreement with the Alaska Bar Association for enforcing Rules of Professional Conduct in a dual state+federal court system of ambiguous jurisdiction, double jeopardy and gun-grabbing vicinage.
The vicinage of a separate “federal” or “U.S.” court system as distinct from the courts of each state is not authorized by the U.S. Constitution, but “the Judges in every State” are bound by the Constitution of the United States, “any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.”
Thus the same courts and the same judges are directly authorized by the U.S. Constitution to rule on matters of U.S. law as well as state and local law, and no separate or simultaneous or concurrent “federal” or “U.S.” criminal prosecutions are valid above or beyond or outside the authority of the State and district wherein the crime is said to have been committed, in pursuance of the Sixth Amendment.
Gun rights up for grabs
So as usual, our gun rights are up for grabs between state gun-grabbers, federal gun-grabbers and defense attorneys who require their clients to forfeit their gun rights as a condition of having any representation in court at all. The most common way to deny gun rights is to allege mental health concerns on behalf of the cummunity.
JUDGE’S GUIDE TO HANDLING CASES INVOLVING PERSONS WITH MENTAL DISORDERS
https://courts.alaska.gov/judges/docs/benchbook.pdf
Erika Eichelberger
Taylor Burke
The Bible [Gen. 13:13] says that the men of Sodom were wicked, and sinners before the Lord exceedingly, and consequently, to this day, when men lust in the concupiscence of their flesh in a court of law to have another individual put away, or committed for involuntary or forcible treatment (drugging and torture) for mental health, the law affords men who have so perverted the law the opportunity to do just that. These are the wealthy and vicious “gentlemen of the district” always presumed competent and innocent themselves, whose lusts and desires are always permitted to hold sway in a court of law to drug, imprison, libel and slander first-amendment auditors, targeted individuals and political dissidents.