Alaska's notoriously corrupt cops are out sport hunting and shooting out of moving aircraft
Hunting is a bygone activity of times past. Today, managed wildlife culls are practiced by qualified police officers who are authorized, licensed, registered and permitted to purchase and possess firearms in accordance with federal, state, and local laws, rules and regulations.
I'm not a big animal lover.
I just don't think cops should be firing deadly weapons out of moving aircraft, and if they are caught doing any such thing, it would be fully justified to deploy anti-aircraft artillery.

I would like to be civil to Alaska's wildlife and traffic cops. I really would. But I've seen way too many of them much too frequently — and as far as I can tell, there is not a single one of them who would hesitate to shoot and kill me personally if he had the opportunity and thought he could get away with it.
No warrant and no other reason for their continual bullying, aggression, hatred and malice is apparent.
We read in the newspapers every year about police-involved shootings of human beings in Alaska. Typically four or five cops will fire their gun in unison at a suspect on the street or in a private residence. It happens execution style. As an impromptu firing squad.
I am very dubious of the success rate of cops hunting bears for sport out of moving aircraft as an exclusive perk of working as a law enforcement officer.
I simply do not want cops to have any capability of shooting or firing weapons out of moving aircraft. That is the Department of the Air Force, and it's court-martial time for “Individuals belonging to one of the eight categories enumerated in Article 4 of the Convention Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, done at Geneva August 12, 1949 (6 UST 3316), who violate the law of war” [10 U.S. Code § 802 ¶ 13].
