Abolish the federal register!

And other firearms confiscation databases in the government

These people will actually publish your name and address in the Federal Register as an armed and dangerous sovereign citizen and have your home ransacked by a SWAT team if you are found to be legally in possession of any firearms or to have had your rights "restored."

Directing the Repeal of Unlawful Regulations
MEMORANDUM FOR THE HEADS OF EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES SUBJECT: DIRECTING THE REPEAL OF UNLAWFUL REGULATIONS
Protecting Second Amendment Rights
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered: Section 1.
Second Amendment Section

Given these two Presidential directives, and the new Second Amendment Section of the Civil Rights Division of the Department of Justice, it is still not clear that any unlawful gun regulations — to wit, unlawful patterns and practices of federal law enforcement officers confiscating guns from people in the course of their government employment without any due process of law — are actually being repealed, or ceased and desisted from being enforced.

Amended Definition of “Adjudicated as a Mental Defective” and “Committed to a Mental Institution” (2010R-21P)
The Department of Justice proposes amending Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) regulations to clarify definitions of two categories of persons who are prohibited from receiving, possessing, shipping, or transporting firearms under the Gun Control Act of 1968. The proposed…

Federal agents have open flouted the law and the constitution by altering and grossly distorting the legal definitions of terms to allege that gun owners in particular are mentally defective or that they “have been committed to a mental institution” in cases where the terms would not be legally applicable for any other purposes except in cases of arresting and prosecuting individuals for purchasing, possessing or carrying firearms.

Obviously a person who is “mentally defective” would not be operating a motor vehicle or riding a bicycle or making cash purchases in stores, nor would a person who “has been committed to a mental institution” be walking free on public sidewalks. But federal agents as well as state troopers and county sheriffs have openly lied in court, distorted the law, and changed how the legal terms apply in their zeal to slam gun owners with extreme risk protective orders and other red flag laws, which are invalid and do not apply for any other purpose than to consfiscate guns or hinder law-abiding citizens from purchasing guns.

How A New Administration Can Overturn A Prior Administration’s Regulations
Presidential elections may bring a new party into power, and with it a new approach to governing. Entering office, the […]
Rolling Back the Administrative State: Understanding Trump’s Deregulatory Initiative | Insights | Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
A broad executive order directs agencies to identify and rescind regulations that are inconsistent with the Trump administration’s policies and that raise legal questions. Ensuing rescissions or modifications could spur litigation.
Eliminating Unnecessary Regulations
Pursuant to an Executive order, the Department of the Treasury (Treasury) is conducting a review of existing regulations, with the goal of reducing regulatory burden by revoking or revising existing regulations that meet the criteria set forth in the Executive order. In support of that objective,…
Withdrawing the Attorney General’s Delegation of Authority
This interim final rule (“IFR”) amends the Department of Justice (“Department”) regulations relating to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (“ATF”) by withdrawing effectively moribund regulations regarding how ATF will adjudicate applications for relief from the disabilities…
ATF Launches New Era of Reform | Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives
The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) is ushering in a new chapter—marked by transparency, accountability, and partnership with the firearms industry. This is not the same ATF of the last four years. We are fundamentally changing course with a renewed focus on rebuilding trust with federal firearms licensees (FFLs), gun owners, and the public by
Justice Department Publishes Proposed Rule to Grant Relief to Certain Individuals Precluded from Possessing Firearms
President Trump directed the Department of Justice to address the ongoing infringements of the Second Amendment rights of our citizens—all of them. Federal law disables the firearms rights of many citizens who have been convicted of crimes without regard to whether they actually pose a threat of violence. But federal law also empowers the Attorney General to
Today, the Department of Justice submitted to the Office of the Federal Register a proposed rule regarding the exercise of the Attorney General’s authority under 18 U.S.C. 925(c) to grant relief to individuals who are otherwise precluded from possessing firearms. ¶"For too long, countless Americans with criminal histories have been permanently disenfranchised from exercising the right to keep and bear arms—a right every bit as constitutionally enshrined as the right to vote, the right to free speech, and the right to free exercise of religion—irrespective of whether they actually pose a threat," said Attorney General Pamela Bondi. "No longer." ¶The proposed rule will provide citizens whose firearm rights are currently under legal disability with an avenue to restore those rights, while keeping firearms out of the hands of dangerous criminals and illegal aliens. Ultimate discretion to grant relief will remain with the Attorney General, and she will exercise that discretion on a case-by-case basis in light of all available facts and evidence that bear on an individual’s application. But absent extraordinary circumstances, violent felons, registered sex offenders, and illegal aliens, in particular, will remain presumptively ineligible for relief.
Alec Baldwin’s ‘Rust’ Case Dismissed Amid Evidence Controversy
The legal saga surrounding Alec Baldwin and “Rust” armorer Hannah Gutierrez-Reed took a dramatic turn on July 12th when a New Mexico court dismissed manslaughter charges against Baldwin, citing a Brady violation. The omission of crucial evidence, a box of ammunition, undermined the trial’s fairness and led to a trial halt and barred retrial. Attention now shifts to Gutierrez-Reed’s legal challenges following her prior conviction.
Alec Baldwin Says He Had Suicidal Thoughts After Charges Were Filed in ‘Rust’ Death a Second Time
“The people I was most concerned about, the people that I had the deepest pain for, were my wife and my kids,” he says. “Because my kids would see me sitting in a corner, you know, I couldn’t even move.”

Owning a gun is an absolute right in America, not a privilege up the discretion of the Attorney General. With all due respect to the law in pursuance of the Constitution, the right to keep and bear Arms is specifically enumerated or mentioned as an absolute right, namely such a right that shall not be infringed. The government has no absolutely no authority or jurisdiction whatsoever to propose or promulgate rules to grab guns from people or to prevent people from purchasing or making or otherwise lawfully acquiring guns or “Arms.”

It is of course the case that the security of a free state depends precisely on the well-regulated Militia of “people” who keep and bear Arms freely without any governmental infringements on their right to do so. This is precisely the sort of Militia intended by our Founding Fathers to regulate itself by each individual’s own decision-making free of government interference or infringement.